Programplaner og emneplaner - Student
PhD Programme in Health Sciences Programme description
- Programme name, Norwegian
- Ph.d.-program i helsevitenskap
- Valid from
- 2025 FALL
- ECTS credits
- 180 ECTS credits
- Duration
- 6 semesters
- Schedule
- Here you can find an example schedule for first year students.
- Programme history
-
Introduction
Hovedformålet med vurdering og veiledning er å forbedre den faglige og didaktiske utviklingen hos den enkelte student. Vurdering og veiledning skal skje fortløpende gjennom hele året. Skriftlige arbeider følges opp av faglærere med veiledning og muntlig og/eller skriftlig tilbakemelding. Etter hvert halvår skal studenter og faglærere oppsummere og evaluere undervisningen og andre læringsaktiviteter.
Eksamenskandidatens rettigheter og plikter framgår av forskrift for studier og eksamen ved OsloMet – storbyuniversitetet. Forskriften beskriver blant annet vilkår for ny/utsatt eksamen, klageadgang og hva som regnes som fusk ved eksamen. Studenten har plikt til å gjøre seg kjent med bestemmelsene i forskriften.
Retten til å avlegge eksamen forutsetter godkjente arbeidskrav og deltakelse i bestemte faglige aktiviteter.
For nærmere informasjon om avsluttende vurdering, se emneplanene.
Sensorordning
Se emneplaner.
Karakterbeskrivelse
A: Har svært solide kunnskaper og særdeles god evne til å orientere seg innenfor kunnskapsfeltet. Viser god analytisk evne og kan bruke informasjon på en kreativ og kritisk måte. Viser høyt refleksjonsnivå som inkluderer læringsmål, fagets egenart og lærerens rolle knyttet til barn og unges læring og utvikling.
Svært god evne til å redegjøre for faglig stoff, oppfatte problemstillinger og til presis begrunnelse for løsningsforslag.
B: Har meget gode kunnskaper og meget god evne til å orientere seg innenfor kunnskapsfeltet. Kan vurdere informasjon kritisk og viser en meget god evne til refleksjon som inkluderer læringsmål, fagets egenart og lærerens rolle knyttet til barn og unges læring og utvikling. Meget god evne til å redegjøre for faglig stoff, oppfatte problemstillinger og til presis begrunnelse for løsningsforslag.
C: Har gode kunnskaper og god evne til å orientere seg innenfor kunnskapsfeltet. Kjenner til ulike informasjonskilder og viser god evne til refleksjon som inkluderer læringsmål, fagets egenart og lærerens rolle knyttet til barn og unges læring og utvikling. God evne til å redegjøre for faglig stoff, oppfatte problemstillinger og til å begrunne løsningsforslag.
D: Har begrensete kunnskaper, men kjennskap til kunnskapsfeltet og viser noe evne til selvstendig anvendelse av kunnskapen. Viser noe evne til refleksjon som inkluderer læringsmål, fagets egenart og lærerens rolle knyttet til barn og unges læring og utvikling. Viser evne til å redegjøre for faglig stoff, oppfatte problemstillinger og til å begrunne løsningsforslag.
E: Tilfredsstiller minimumskravene til kunnskaper, men anvender kunnskapen på en uselvstendig måte. Lavt refleksjonsnivå som inkluderer læringsmål, fagets egenart og lærerens rolle knyttet til barn og unges læring og utvikling. Viser noe evne til å redegjøre for faglig stoff, oppfatte problemstillinger og til å begrunne løsningsforslag.
F (Ikke bestått): Har utilstrekkelige kunnskaper og viser utilstrekkelig kjennskap til læringsmål, fagets egenart og lærerens rolle knyttet til barn og unges læring og utvikling. Klarer i utilstrekkelig grad å redegjøre for faglig stoff, oppfatter ikke problemstillinger og klarer ikke å begrunne løsningsforslag.
Target group
Programplan for naturfag 1 for trinn 5–10 – oppdrag
Science Education 1 for Lower Secondary School, level 5–10
30 studiepoeng, deltid
Godkjent av prodekan for studier 20. februar 2015
Siste revisjon 05.12.2022
Gjeldende fra høstsemesteret 2023
Fakultet for lærerutdanning og internasjonale studier
Institutt for grunnskole- og faglærerutdanning
Admission requirements
Applicants to the PhD programme must hold a master's degree (120 credits) or equivalent qualification. Admission to the programme is regulated by the Regulations Relating to the Degree of Philosophiae Doctor (PhD) at Oslo Metropolitan University, and the Supplementary guidelines for the PhD programme in Health Sciences. According to the PhD Regulations, section 2.2, applications for admission to the programme must contain:
A. Documentation of completed education on which the decision regarding admission should be based (certified copies of original certificates).
B. A project description containing
- an academic account of the project
- a progress plan for completing the programme
- documentation of special needs for academic and material resources
- plans for stays at other institutions, where applicable
- academic dissemination
- specification of the chosen language for the thesis
- details of any restrictions on intellectual property rights to protect the rights of other parties
C. A funding plan.
D. A plan for the training component.
E. A proposal for at least two academic supervisors.
F. An account of any legal or ethical issues raised by the project.
G. Details about whether the project requires permission from research ethics committees or other official or private bodies. Such permission should be obtained and enclosed with the application, if possible.
Decisions on admissions are based on an overall assessment of applications. The doctoral degree committee at the Faculty of Health Sciences at OsloMet shall consider admission applications.
Admissions to the PhD programme in Health Sciences are considered on an ongoing basis. Pursuant to the Regulation, section 2-6, admission to PhD programmes is formalised by a written contract between the PhD candidate, the supervisor(s) and the Faculty of Health Sciences.
The courses included in the training component can also be offered to students who have been admitted to the “Health Science Research Programme, 60 ECTS”, by prior approval from the supervisor and based on given guidelines for the research programme.
Learning outcomes
On completion of the PhD Programme in Health Sciences, the candidate should have achieved the following learning outcomes defined as knowledge, skills, and general competence:
Knowledge
The candidate
- is in the forefront of knowledge within the field of research and masters the field’s philosophy of science and methodology
- is in the forefront of knowledge on the current national and international academic debates within health sciences specific to their own research field
- can evaluate the expediency and application of theories within health sciences and methodology specific to those theories
- can evaluate the research ethics related to the application of different research methods
- can evaluate the expediency and application of different methods and processes in health research
- can contribute to the development of new knowledge, new theories, and new methods within health sciences specific to their own field
Skills
The candidate can
- formulate research questions and decide appropriate research design, plan and carry out research projects, analyse data, and discuss the results
- place their own project in relation to a theoretical context and research tradition within health sciences
- carry out high-level research in cooperation with national and international research environments
- manage complex academic issues related to ethics, theory and method within their field of research
- challenge established knowledge and practice within their area of the health sciences
- disseminate their research both within the scientific community and to a wider audience
General competence
The candidate can
- identify and discuss ethical issues in health sciences
- carry out their research with scholarly and ethical integrity
- manage complex interdisciplinary assignments and projects
- participate in debates in international forums of their research field
- assess the need for, initiate, and practice innovation in health sciences
Teaching and learning methods
The learning outcomes of the programme include knowledge at the forefront of research, managing complex academic issues, and a high level of general competence in the field of health sciences. This means that the work and teaching methods must be sufficiently varied and complex to support the candidates' learning process on the way to achieving the learning outcomes.
Training component
Lectures
The lectures will cover key topics in the courses and will introduce current issues and new research findings.
Self-study
Achievement of the learning outcomes depends mainly on the degree to which the PhD candidate makes effective use of the instruction and supervision offered and accepts responsibility for working independently. Self-study entails student-initiated activities such as individual study and cooperation with fellow students. Self-study takes as its starting point the theoretical and methodological issues and a knowledge base in the health sciences.
Seminars
Organized group work requires candidates to discuss given research problems based on a topic covered in the course and on their respective academic backgrounds. This offers the candidates opportunities to reflect on multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research problems. The outcomes of the seminars are presented and discussed in plenary sessions, providing candidates with training in both academic dissemination and peer review.
Practical application of methodology
Different methodologies are applied in practical exercises, such as research interviews, qualitative and quantitative analyses, and different types of software. This provides candidates with practical experience in addressing, for example, complex analyses.
Research component
Research work
The work methods for the thesis consist mostly of self-study and research activities. Self-study entails student-initiated activities such as individual study and cooperation with fellow students and researchers. Research activities involve planning and conducting own research, processing the results, and designing the thesis. This part constitutes the most important contribution to the PhD candidate's research competence.
Supervision
The main supervisor has overall academic responsibility for the PhD candidate and shall normally be an employee of OsloMet. As a general rule, the candidate shall also have a co-supervisor from OsloMet or from another institution. If an external main supervisor is appointed, an employee of OsloMet shall be appointed as co-supervisor. Each PhD candidate is entitled to 210 hours of supervision, including preliminary and follow-up work. Supervision includes time spent on preparatory work, discussions with the PhD candidate, and follow-up work. Requirements regarding supervisors and rights and obligations are regulated in the PhD Regulations, section 3-1 to 3-3. The PhD candidate and the supervisor(s) must independently submit annual progress reports. Supervision of the thesis shall ensure that the project is in accordance with ethical guidelines and shall contribute to the design of research problems and the quality of the methods to be used.
Participation in research communities
The candidates' thesis projects are linked to OsloMet’s established research communities via the candidates' supervisors. Active participation in the research communities will provide candidates with insight into research management and experience in multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research cooperation. Participation also provides them with opportunities to discuss research problems and designs, challenge established knowledge and practice and present their own projects. Candidates will have opportunities to establish and further develop cooperation with national and international research communities.
Research seminar and dissemination
Candidates must present their projects at the start and halfway through the programme.The midway presentation must ideally be conducted in English and be followed by a discussion on the current progress between the PhD candidate, an independent evaluator, and the supervisor(s). Furthermore, candidates are expected to present their research at international scientific conferences. This gives candidates competence in participating in scientific discussions within their field of research in cooperation with national and international research communities. Candidates are also encouraged to disseminate their projects to broader audiences, such as giving lectures to users or through popular science channels.
Descriptions of the work and teaching methods for the individual courses are provided in the course plans.
Internationalisation
OsloMet has an extensive international network that includes cooperation partnerships in doctoral programmes and research projects in the health sciences. The Faculty of Health Sciences will place emphasis on inviting health science researchers from foreign institutions to give lectures.
OsloMet will encourage candidates to conduct some of the work on their thesis through collaboration with international research communities. Candidates may earn up to 5 credits for undertaking research stays abroad. Such research stays must be academically relevant and must last for at least 2 weeks. Up to 1 credit per week may be awarded, and a stay of 5 weeks may therefore be awarded 5 credits. Candidates are required to give at least one presentation of their research to their host institution during their stay. An agreement must be made to ensure that candidates participate in an active research community at the host institution and that they are provided with the necessary infrastructure to do so.
Candidates are expected to present their research at an international scientific conference.The midway presentation of the thesis must ideally be conducted in English. All teaching and supervision in connection with the PhD programme may also be conducted in English if necessary.
Assessment
Examination and grading systems
Assessment of examinations in the training component will be conducted in accordance with the provisions regarding examinations and cheating in the Regulations relating to Studies and Examinations at OsloMet; see the PhD Regulations, section 4-3.
All examinations in the training component will be specified on the certificate.
The forms of assessment for courses PHVIT9100 to PHVIT9600 (except PHVIT9550) and the PHBA courses in the training component consist of individual home examinations, essays, or portfolio. Home examinations shall be used for the compulsory courses and the methodology courses. These are appropriate for testing candidates' knowledge, skills, and general competence under specific conditions. Home examinations are based on specific questions. Answer papers must normally contain up to 3,500 words for courses worth 5 credits, and 5,000 words for courses worth 10 credits. Essays are used for examinations in some of the elective courses and are based on a specific concept and/or theory of the candidate's choice. As a form of examination, essays are suitable for giving candidates the opportunity to critically reflect on their own research work in terms of topic, research problems, concepts, theoretical issues, and methodological and ethical challenges covered in the respective courses. Essays must consist of up to 5,000 words and must be submitted no more than 2 weeks after the end of the course. The portfolio exams can consist of several individual works. For the elective course PHVIT9550, each candidate must plan and write a protocol of a systematic review based on a research question of their choice, to be submitted no more than 6 months after the first day of the course.
Course code / Assesment / Grading scale
- PHVIT9000 / Individual home exam / Pass-Fail
- PHVIT9100 / Individual home exam / Pass-Fail
- PHVIT9200 / Individual home exam / Pass-Fail
- PHVIT9300 / Individual home exam / Pass-Fail
- PHVIT9560 / Individual home exam /Pass-Fail
- PHVIT9570 / Individual home exam/Pass-Fail
- PHVIT9580 / Indidivual home exam/Pass-Fail
- PHVIT9510 / Essay / Pass-Fail
- PHVIT9520 / Essay / Pass-Fail
- PHVIT9530 / Essay / Pass-Fail
- PHVIT9540 / Essay / Pass-Fail
- PHVIT9600 / Essay / Pass-Fail
- PHVIT9550 / Protocol of a systematic review / Pass-Fail
- PHBA8110 / Portfolio / Pass-Fail
- PHBA8200 / Portfolio / Pass-Fail
- PHBA8230 / Portfolio / Pass-Fail
- PHBA8240 / Portfolio / Pass-Fail
- PHVIT9900 / Thesis / Pass-Fail
Grading
Assessment of PhD theses in health sciences is regulated by the PhD Regulations, sections 6-1 to 6-8 and general regulations regarding doctoral degrees at OsloMet. Supplementary guidelines for the PhD Programme in Health Sciences contain more details regarding procedures for assessing PhD theses.
Examinations are assessed by an internal examiner. All courses are graded on the basis of pass or fail.
The thesis is assessed by an assessment committee consisting of three members, two of whom are external examiners: see the PhD Regulations, section 6-3. Once the thesis is considered worthy of public defense, the candidate must deliver and receive approval of a trial lecture on a given subject and must defend the thesis in a public defense.
The degree of philosophiae doctor is conferred on the basis of
- approval of the training component
- approval of the thesis
- approval of the trial lecture on a given topic
- approval of the public defense of the thesis
Study progression
The training component must be approved by the faculty, and the work required for PHVIT9900, the thesis, must be approved before the candidate may apply to have the thesis assessed.
Other information
Approval
Approved by the Academic Affairs Committee at Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences on 16 October 2012Last amendment approved by the Vice Dean for Research and Innovation at the Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet, on 17. January 2025
Syllabus
Course syllabuses will be reviewed and, where necessary, updated every time they are offered. Candidates must submit a detailed list of their chosen syllabus, which must meet the specified learning outcomes for the respective courses. The candidate's chosen syllabus must be approved by the course coordinator.