SOS1140 Velferdsrett - juss i sosialt arbeid Emneplan

Emnet gir en innføring i juridisk metode, menneskerettigheter og forvaltnings- og velferdsrett av relevans for sosialt arbeid. Undervisningen tar utgangspunkt i rettsanvendelse som en del av profesjonsutøvelsen. I emnet vil studentene få en innføring i det norske rettssystemet og hvordan man går frem når man skal løse juridiske problemstillinger i sosialt arbeid (rettskildelære og juridisk metode). Studentene vil lære om alminnelig og spesiell forvaltningsrett, sentrale velferdsrettslige lover og menneskerettigheter.

I begynnelsen av emnet vil det tverrprofesjonelle undervisningsopplegget "Den samme ungen- ulike arenaer" (INTER1100) gjennomføres. Se INTERACTs hjemmeside for mer utfyllende beskrivelse av innholdet i INTER1100: https://www.oslomet.no/forskning/forskningsprosjekter/interact

Undervisningsspråk er norsk.

On successful completion of the course, students should have the following learning outcomes defined in terms of knowledge, skills, and general competence.

Knowledge

The student:

• has advanced knowledge in sub-symbolic and bio-inspired AI methods.
• has a clear understanding of key concepts in AI such as emergence, adaptation, evolution.
• has a clear understanding of complex systems modelling and analysis.

Skills

The student:

• can program complex systems using bio-inspired AI methods.
• can design and implement evolutionary and swarm robotic systems.
• can model complex systems using evolutionary AI models.

General Competence

The student:

• has theoretical and practical understanding of biologically-inspired AI methods, evolutionary robotics, complex systems methods.
• can understand and discuss relevance, strength and limitations of biologically inspired and complex systems.
• is able to work in relevant research projects.

The course consists of lectures and seminars on techniques and methods, as well as working on a project that will be chosen from a portfolio of available problems. The students will work individually or in groups (2-3 students) and will submit the code and a project report.

Practical training

Lab sessions.

The following required coursework must be approved before the student can take the exam:

• Two mandatory mid-term group reports on the given portfolio/project (1000-1500 words)
• One mandatory mid-term group oral presentation on the given portfolio/projects (20 minutes; 15 minutes of presentation and 5 minutes of questions and answers. All group members must be present at the group presentation and participate in questions and answers.)

The assessment will be based on the following:

• A group project delivery (2-4 students), consisting of a report (7500-3000 words) and code
• An individual oral examination (20 minutes)

The weight of the two parts is 50% each. The oral exam (individual) cannot be appealed.

Both parts must be separately passed in order to pass the course.

The project report should be between 7500-3000 words. Both the code/program and the report will be evaluated. The comprehensiveness of the code/program is evaluated with the assumption that each student in the group has committed about 60 hours towards developing the solution. As a general guideline, the code/program carries a stronger weight than the report.

New/postponed exam

In case of failed exam or legal absence, the student may apply for a new or postponed exam. New or postponed exams are offered within a reasonable time span following the regular exam. The student is responsible for registering for a new/postponed exam within the time limits set by OsloMet. The Regulations for new or postponed examinations are available in Regulations relating to studies and examinations at OsloMet.

Grade scale A-F.

Two internal examiners. External examiner is used periodically.

Associate Professor Kazi Shah Nawaz Ripon

Det benyttes intern og ekstern sensor til sensurering av besvarelsene. Et uttrekk på minst 25 % av besvarelsene sensureres av to sensorer. Karakterene på disse samsensurerte besvarelsene skal danne grunnlag for å fastsette nivå på resten av besvarelsene.

Anniken Sørlie og Helena Bärlund