EPN-V2

SFV4400 Social sustainability, social work and Human Rights Course description

Course name in Norwegian
Social sustainability, social work and Human Rights
Study programme
Master Programme in Applied Social Sciences - Study Option International Social Welfare and Health Policy
Master Programme in Applied Social Sciences - Programme Option Child Care, part-time
Master Programme in Applied Social Sciences - Programme Option Child Care
Master in Programme Applied Social Sciences
Master Programme in Applied Social Sciences
Elective modules, Master Programme in Applied Social Sciences
Master Programme in Applied Social Sciences - Programme Option Social Work, part-time
Master Programme in Applied Social Sciences - Programme Option Social Work
Weight
10.0 ECTS
Year of study
2016/2017
Curriculum
SPRING 2017
Schedule
Course history

Learning outcomes

A list of reference aids allowed will be published on our website.

Content

This course provides a deeper insight into normative issues in the field of social work and welfare administration, based on a human rights perspective. Universal issues in social welfare, such as unemployment and income are discussed in light of existing research. The relationship between children's and parents' rights, as well as the safe-guarding of children's rights in social and welfare services, are discussed as topics in the course. Gender and ethnicity are also focused upon.

Teaching and learning methods

Letter grading A-F.

Course requirements

In addition to the course instructor, an external or internal examiner will be used for all the exams. The exam questions will be approved by an external examiner.

Assessment

The student's learning outcome will be assessed on the basis of a seven-day written home exam on a topic given by the course lecturers. The length of one's answers is 11 pages (+/-10%).

Students are awarded grades on a descending scale from A to E for pass, and F for fail.

The home exam will be assessed by an internal and external examiner. The external examiner grades a random sample consisting of approx. 20 per cent of the written exams. The grades given for this sample provide a basis for the internal examiner's assessment. The external examiner will also grade papers where there is doubt about giving a grade of pass. Students who have failed a regular examination are entitled to sit a new examination.

Norwegian speaking students can choose to write their work requirement and written home examination in Norwegian.

Syllabus

Approx. 831 pages.

* To be published in a separate compendium .

** Available on Internet .

*Alston, P. 1994. The Best Interests Principle: Towards A Reconciliation of Culture and Human Rights. I The best Interest of the Child: Reconciling culture and Human Rights , red. Philip Alston. Oxford University Press, pp. 1-25 (24 p.).

**Benhabib, Seyla (2007). Universalism: On the Unity and Diversity of Human Rights. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, Vol. 81. No. 2 (Nov. 2007). Pp. 7-32

http://www.yale.edu/polisci/sbenhabib/papers/On%20the%20Unity%20and%20Diversity%20of%20Human%20Rights.pdf

*Council of Europe Recommendation Rec. 2006. 19 on policy to support positive parenting. 13. December 2006. (7 p.)

**Clark, Zoë and Ziegler, Holger 2014. The UN Children's Rights Convention and the Capabilities Approach ' Family Duties and Children's Rights in Tension. In: Stoecklin D., Bonvin J.-M., eds. Children's Rights and the Capabilities Approach. Challenges and Prospects . Children's Well-Being: Indicators and Research. Chapter 11. Pp. 213-231. 19 p.

Hartley, Dean (2015). Social rights and human welfare . London og New York: Routledge. Taylor & Francis. 166 pages

*Dominelli, L. 2007. Human Rights in Social Work Practice. An Invisible Part of the Social Work Curriculum? I Challenges in Human Rights. A Social Work Perspective , red. E . Reichert . Columbia University Press. New York (27 p.).

*Eide, A. 2006. A Commentary to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 27 ' The Right to an Adequate Standard of Living. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Pp. 1-9 (9 p.).

*Eide, A. Catarina Krause and Allan Rosas (red.). 2001. Economic, social and cultural rights: a textbook. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Chapters 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 12 and 13 (all together 122 p.).

*Freeman, M. 2002. Human rights, children's rights and judgement ' some thoughts on reconciling universality and pluralism. The International Journal of Children's Rights . Nr. 10 pp. 345-354. (9 p.)

*Haas, M. 2008. International Human Rights. Routledge. T & F Group. Chapter 4 (pp. 72-99);

Chapter 9 (pp. 188-214); Chapter 10 (pp. 215-222); Chapter 12 (pp. 269-289). (All together 88 pages).

*Healy, L. M. 2008. Exploring the history of social work as a human rights profession. International Social Work 5 (6): 735-748 (13 p.).

*Henquinet, Kari Bergstrom. 2013. Translating women´s rights in Niger: What happened to the ´radical challenge to patriarchy?´ I: Derman, Bill, Anne Hellum & Kristin Bergtora Sandvik. Worlds of Human Rights ' the Ambiguities of Rights Claiming in Africa. Leiden/Boston: Brill (23 pages)

*Hoffman, S-L. (ed.). 2010. Human Rights in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 13- 25 (12 p.).

*Ife, Jim. 2012. Human Rights and Social Work. Towards rights-based practice . Chapters 5, 6. Cambridge University Press. (38 p.).

*Ife, Jim. 2012. Seven arenas of human rights from below. I: Ife, Jim. 2012. Human right from below. Chapter 6. Cambridge University Press (42 p.).

*Kjørstad, M. 2016 [2005]. Between professional ethics and bureaucratic rationality. The challenging ethical position of social workers who are faced with implementing a workfare policy. European Journal of Social Work , vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 381-398 (17 p.).

*Levine, Hephzibah and Philip Veerman. Government obligation to provide access to social security for children of minority ethno-linguistic groups: The case of Arab children in Israel. International Journal of Children's Rights. Pp. 273-281 (8 p.).

*Pecnic, N. 2007. Towards a vision of parenting in the best interests of the child. In M. Daly (ed.) Parenting in contemporary Europe: a positive approach (pp. 15-36). Council of Europe (21 p.).

*Sandbæk, M. 2008. The Council of Europe's Policy to Promote children's Rights ' Achievements and Challenges. International Journal of Child & Family Welfare, 11 (4):146-154 (8 p.).

*Sayer, A. 2008. Ethics Unbound: For a Normative Turn in Social Theory. I Realism and Social Science. Ch. 8. SAGE Publications Ltd, London (17 p.).

*Staub-Bernasconi, S. 2007. Economic and Social Rights. The Neglected Human Rights. I: Reichert, E. (ed.) Challenges in Human Rights. A Social Work Perspective , Columbia University Press. New York. (23 p.).

*Taket, Ann. 2012. Human rights and health equity. I: Taket, Ann. 2012. Health equity, social justice and human rights. Chapter 5. London: Cambridge. (26 p.)

*The European Committee of Social Rights. Digest of the Case Law of the European Committee of Social Rights . Council of Europe, 1. September 2008. Selected pages (15 p.).

*Vandenhole, W. 2007. A Commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Article 26 ' The Right to Benefit from Social Security. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Pp. 21-44 (23 p.).

*Wabwile, Michael (2010) Implementing the Social and Economic Rights of Children in Developing Countries: the Place of International Assistance and Cooperation. International Journal of Children's Rights. 18. 2010. Pp. 364-371 and 380-382. (9 p.).

*United Nations, Commitee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (FNs komité for økonomiske, sosiale og kulturelle rettigheter):

General Comment No.3 (1990): The Nature of States Parties' Obligations (5 p.).

General Comment No.18 (2005): The right to work (15 p.).

General Comment No.19 (2007): The right to social security (21 p.).

Judicial decisions

Stec and others v. UK 65731/01 and 65900/01 (5 September 2005)

Moskal v. Poland app. 10373/05 (15 September 2009 'dissens 4-3)

Klein v. Austria app. 57028/00 (3 March 2011)

**International Federation of Social Workers: Statement of Ethical Principles. 3 March 2012

**International Federation of Social Work: Global Definition of Social Work. Adopted by the IFSW General Meeting and the IASSW General Assembly in July 2014