EPN-V2

SFV4400 Social sustainability, social work and Human Rights Emneplan

Engelsk emnenavn
Social sustainability, social work and Human Rights
Omfang
10.0 stp.
Studieår
2016/2017
Emnehistorikk
Timeplan
  • Læringsutbytte

    Velferdsstaten virker og eksisterer gjennom et vell av tekster. Tekster så forskjellige som NOUer, journaler, Stortingsmeldinger, nyhetsreportasjer og møtereferater bidrar til å forme politikk og påvirker viktige beslutningsprosesser. Hvordan en «klient», «bruker», «pasient» eller «beboer» fremstilles i en journal kan få avgjørende betydning for personens videre liv. Emnet fokuserer på språk som en maktfaktor i velferdsstaten og i de ansatte i velferdsforvaltningens møte med den enkelte klient.

  • Innhold

    Studentene skal skrive et essay med utgangspunkt i en selvvalgt tekst. I essayet skal studentene analysere den selvvalgte teksten med utgangspunkt i en av analysemetodene på pensum. Valg av analysemetode skal begrunnes ut fra dens anvendelighet i forhold til valgte problemstilling og tekst. Essayet skal være på 10 sider +/- 10 %. Midtveis i emnet vil studentene som deltar på skriveseminarene få tilbakemelding på et førsteutkast til essay fra henholdsvis to medstudenter og faglærer. Essayet bearbeides deretter videre og leveres til en fastsatt frist.

  • Arbeids- og undervisningsformer

    Ingen info

  • Arbeidskrav og obligatoriske aktiviteter

    Etter å ha fullført emnet skal studenten ha følgende kunnskaper og ferdigheter:

    Kunnskap

    Studenten har innsikt i

    • ulike tekstanalytiske tradisjoner
    • ulike teorier om makt og språk
    • ulike tekstsjangre med betydning for velferdssamfunnet

    Ferdigheter

    Kandidaten kan selvstendig

    • diskutere anvendeligheten av ulike tekstanalytiske metoder
    • analysere ulike velferdstekster
    • reflektere over språk og tekst som maktfaktorer innenfor velferdssamfunnet og i eget arbeid
  • Vurdering og eksamen

    The student's learning outcome will be assessed on the basis of a seven-day written home exam on a topic given by the course lecturers. The length of one's answers is 11 pages (+/-10%).

    Students are awarded grades on a descending scale from A to E for pass, and F for fail.

    The home exam will be assessed by an internal and external examiner. The external examiner grades a random sample consisting of approx. 20 per cent of the written exams. The grades given for this sample provide a basis for the internal examiner's assessment. The external examiner will also grade papers where there is doubt about giving a grade of pass. Students who have failed a regular examination are entitled to sit a new examination.

    Norwegian speaking students can choose to write their work requirement and written home examination in Norwegian.

    Syllabus

    Approx. 831 pages.

    * To be published in a separate compendium .

    ** Available on Internet .

    *Alston, P. 1994. The Best Interests Principle: Towards A Reconciliation of Culture and Human Rights. I The best Interest of the Child: Reconciling culture and Human Rights , red. Philip Alston. Oxford University Press, pp. 1-25 (24 p.).

    **Benhabib, Seyla (2007). Universalism: On the Unity and Diversity of Human Rights. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, Vol. 81. No. 2 (Nov. 2007). Pp. 7-32

    http://www.yale.edu/polisci/sbenhabib/papers/On%20the%20Unity%20and%20Diversity%20of%20Human%20Rights.pdf

    *Council of Europe Recommendation Rec. 2006. 19 on policy to support positive parenting. 13. December 2006. (7 p.)

    **Clark, Zoë and Ziegler, Holger 2014. The UN Children's Rights Convention and the Capabilities Approach ' Family Duties and Children's Rights in Tension. In: Stoecklin D., Bonvin J.-M., eds. Children's Rights and the Capabilities Approach. Challenges and Prospects . Children's Well-Being: Indicators and Research. Chapter 11. Pp. 213-231. 19 p.

    Hartley, Dean (2015). Social rights and human welfare . London og New York: Routledge. Taylor & Francis. 166 pages

    *Dominelli, L. 2007. Human Rights in Social Work Practice. An Invisible Part of the Social Work Curriculum? I Challenges in Human Rights. A Social Work Perspective , red. E . Reichert . Columbia University Press. New York (27 p.).

    *Eide, A. 2006. A Commentary to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 27 ' The Right to an Adequate Standard of Living. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Pp. 1-9 (9 p.).

    *Eide, A. Catarina Krause and Allan Rosas (red.). 2001. Economic, social and cultural rights: a textbook. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Chapters 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 12 and 13 (all together 122 p.).

    *Freeman, M. 2002. Human rights, children's rights and judgement ' some thoughts on reconciling universality and pluralism. The International Journal of Children's Rights . Nr. 10 pp. 345-354. (9 p.)

    *Haas, M. 2008. International Human Rights. Routledge. T & F Group. Chapter 4 (pp. 72-99);

    Chapter 9 (pp. 188-214); Chapter 10 (pp. 215-222); Chapter 12 (pp. 269-289). (All together 88 pages).

    *Healy, L. M. 2008. Exploring the history of social work as a human rights profession. International Social Work 5 (6): 735-748 (13 p.).

    *Henquinet, Kari Bergstrom. 2013. Translating women´s rights in Niger: What happened to the ´radical challenge to patriarchy?´ I: Derman, Bill, Anne Hellum & Kristin Bergtora Sandvik. Worlds of Human Rights ' the Ambiguities of Rights Claiming in Africa. Leiden/Boston: Brill (23 pages)

    *Hoffman, S-L. (ed.). 2010. Human Rights in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 13- 25 (12 p.).

    *Ife, Jim. 2012. Human Rights and Social Work. Towards rights-based practice . Chapters 5, 6. Cambridge University Press. (38 p.).

    *Ife, Jim. 2012. Seven arenas of human rights from below. I: Ife, Jim. 2012. Human right from below. Chapter 6. Cambridge University Press (42 p.).

    *Kjørstad, M. 2016 [2005]. Between professional ethics and bureaucratic rationality. The challenging ethical position of social workers who are faced with implementing a workfare policy. European Journal of Social Work , vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 381-398 (17 p.).

    *Levine, Hephzibah and Philip Veerman. Government obligation to provide access to social security for children of minority ethno-linguistic groups: The case of Arab children in Israel. International Journal of Children's Rights. Pp. 273-281 (8 p.).

    *Pecnic, N. 2007. Towards a vision of parenting in the best interests of the child. In M. Daly (ed.) Parenting in contemporary Europe: a positive approach (pp. 15-36). Council of Europe (21 p.).

    *Sandbæk, M. 2008. The Council of Europe's Policy to Promote children's Rights ' Achievements and Challenges. International Journal of Child & Family Welfare, 11 (4):146-154 (8 p.).

    *Sayer, A. 2008. Ethics Unbound: For a Normative Turn in Social Theory. I Realism and Social Science. Ch. 8. SAGE Publications Ltd, London (17 p.).

    *Staub-Bernasconi, S. 2007. Economic and Social Rights. The Neglected Human Rights. I: Reichert, E. (ed.) Challenges in Human Rights. A Social Work Perspective , Columbia University Press. New York. (23 p.).

    *Taket, Ann. 2012. Human rights and health equity. I: Taket, Ann. 2012. Health equity, social justice and human rights. Chapter 5. London: Cambridge. (26 p.)

    *The European Committee of Social Rights. Digest of the Case Law of the European Committee of Social Rights . Council of Europe, 1. September 2008. Selected pages (15 p.).

    *Vandenhole, W. 2007. A Commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Article 26 ' The Right to Benefit from Social Security. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Pp. 21-44 (23 p.).

    *Wabwile, Michael (2010) Implementing the Social and Economic Rights of Children in Developing Countries: the Place of International Assistance and Cooperation. International Journal of Children's Rights. 18. 2010. Pp. 364-371 and 380-382. (9 p.).

    *United Nations, Commitee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (FNs komité for økonomiske, sosiale og kulturelle rettigheter):

    General Comment No.3 (1990): The Nature of States Parties' Obligations (5 p.).

    General Comment No.18 (2005): The right to work (15 p.).

    General Comment No.19 (2007): The right to social security (21 p.).

    Judicial decisions

    Stec and others v. UK 65731/01 and 65900/01 (5 September 2005)

    Moskal v. Poland app. 10373/05 (15 September 2009 'dissens 4-3)

    Klein v. Austria app. 57028/00 (3 March 2011)

    **International Federation of Social Workers: Statement of Ethical Principles. 3 March 2012

    **International Federation of Social Work: Global Definition of Social Work. Adopted by the IFSW General Meeting and the IASSW General Assembly in July 2014