Programplaner og emneplaner - Student
REAK6100 Realkompetansevurdering Emneplan
- Engelsk emnenavn
- Validation of Prior Learning
- Studieprogram
-
Realkompetansevurdering
- Omfang
- 15.0 stp.
- Studieår
- 2022/2023
- Pensum
-
HØST 2022
- Timeplan
- Programplan
- Emnehistorikk
-
Innledning
When students have been accepted in a project they are expected to produce the following:;
1. The student will choose about 500 pages for a reading list that are thematically, methodologically and scientifically relevant for the scientific outcome, which has to be submitted as a work requirement.
2. A scientific outcome.;A relevant scientific outcome for the project may be: ;
- a paper produced as a working paper
- a;paper, poster, film or exhibit for presentation in a scientific conference
- an independent or co-authored publication
- a presentation of results for stakeholders
- an integrated part of a larger publication from the project. In this case, the student and the supervisor must indicate which part of the publication the student is responsible for.
- a policy-brief, summarizing the main findings as well as suggesting the implications and recommendations of these findings
- or other output approved by the course coordinator and the supervisor
The scientific outcome can be submitted as an individual;or as a joint;work.
3. In addition to the scientific output from the project participation, each student will deliver an individual report of between 1000 - 3000 words from the research training. This report should contain a critical reflection of the learning process as well as;the student's individual contribution, uses of method or implication of the produced knowledge.
The work should amount to the equivalent of 6 weeks of full time studies.
Forkunnskapskrav
The following coursework requirement;must be completed and;approved by the given deadline;in order for the student to sit;the final;exam:
The student will choose about 500 pages for a reading list that is;thematically, methodologically and scientifically relevant for the scientific outcome.
Reading lists;that are not approved after two submissions will disqualify students from submitting the final exam paper.
Læringsutbytte
The exam in the course consists of an individual written report (the report must have a scope of between 4 - 9 pages, tables and references are not included. Font and font size: Calibri 12 points. Line spacing: 1.5), as well as a relevant scientific outcome from the participation (a paper, an article, a policy-brief or other relevant output).
Together with the report the submission should include the approved reading list.
Students awarded a fail grade are given one opportunity to submit an improved version of the report for assessment
Innhold
- Mål og intensjoner med kartlegging og verdsetting av realkompetanse
- Det juridiske grunnlaget - rammene for realkompetansevurdering
- Roller, oppgaver og ansvar for de ulike fasene i arbeid med realkompetanse
- Analyse av læreplaner/studieplaner
- Likeverdig kompetanse
- Skjønnsutøvelse
- Vurdering i et flerkulturelt perspektiv
- Verktøy og metoder for kartlegging og verdsetting av realkompetanse
Arbeids- og undervisningsformer
All aids are permitted, as long as the rules for source referencing are complied with
Arbeidskrav og obligatoriske aktiviteter
Pass / fail
Vurdering og eksamen
The submitted exam will be evaluated by the course coordinator and training supervisor.
Vurderingsuttrykk
Simon Innvær
Sensorordning
Det benyttes to interne sensorer. Tilsynssensor brukes i samsvar med retningslinjer for oppnevning og bruk av sensorer ved OsloMet.