MBH4260 Flerspråklighet og fortellingsmangfold Emneplan

Språk- og fortellingsmangfold er en del av barnehagehverdagen; barna er på ulike stadier i sin språkutvikling og de har ulike repertoarer av språk og dialekter. I tillegg har barna erfaringer med ulike fortellingsunivers, sjangre, formidlingsformer og medier: barnelitteratur, eventyr og religiøse fortellinger, prosa, dikt og sanger, kapittelbøker, bildebøker og animasjonsfilmer, høytlesning, gjenfortelling og improvisasjon, osv. Barnehagen skal åpne for forståelse og legge til rette for dialog og medvirkning. Fortellinger inviterer til fellesskap og forståelse og gir rom for samspill og dialog.

I dette emnet skal studentene arbeide med språklig mangfold og teorier om barns språklige utvikling med fokus på flerspråklighet. Studentene vil få reflektere over egne språklige erfaringer og diskutere disse i lys av kategorier som språk, dialekt, variant og aksent. Studentene skal reflektere over hvilke forståelser av språk, språkutvikling og språkmangfold som ligger til grunn for barnehagens praksis.

Videre skal studentene i dette emnet utforske et mangfold av fortellinger fra ulike kontekster og i ulike formater. I arbeidet med fortellingsdidaktikk og formidling vil studentene lære om ulike innfallsvinkler til fortellinger, øve seg som fortellere og diskutere fortellinger i barnekultur, populærkultur og religion.

Studentene vil undersøke digitale verktøy til produksjon av fortellinger, til formidling av fortellinger og som kilder til fortellinger. Emnet omfatter spørsmål om etikk, dømmekraft og refleksjon som reises når teknologi blir en del av barnehagens arbeid med flerspråklighet og fortellingsmangfold.

Emnet inngår som del av masterprogrammet i barnehagekunnskap.

Ingen

In a democratic society, science and scientific communities should be subject to a rigorous process of dialogue and critique. However, many journalists and science writers covering science have tended to regard themselves solely as translators and disseminators of scientific knowledge. Scientific institutions have, for their part, become increasingly skillful in shaping the image of science in the public. This course draws upon studies of how the media represent science, scientific uncertainty and risk. The students will be encouraged to explore other ways of representing science and science related issues in journalistic work and science writing.

All exam papers are assessed by an internal examiner. In addition, at least 25 % of the exam papers will be assessed by an external examiner, whose assessment will form the basis of the level for each grade within the grading scale. The internal examiner’s assessment of all papers shall be based on the external examiner’s assessment.

No prerequisites

The student should have the following learning outcomes upon successful completion of the course:

Knowledge

The student

• has advanced knowledge of how science is put to use and how it shapes and is shaped by society
• has thorough knowledge of how the media represents science, scientific uncertainty and risks

Skills

The student

• is able to critically analyze practical journalistic work and science writing which covers scientific issues or uses scientists as expert sources
• is able to critically use this knowledge to explore other ways of representing science and science related issues in journalistic work and science writing
• has developed and perfected his/her science journalism and/or science writing
• can apply relevant methods to explore this area of journalism and science writing
• can inspire colleagues and students to reflect on the role of science in society and journalism/science writing
• is able to communicate key issues in the research area Science and the media

General competence

The student

• is able to analyze professional and occupational issues as well as questions in research ethics
• is well qualified to present academic scientific work as well as analysis of journalistic and science writing material and is able to give and receive constructive criticism and response
• is able to discuss ethical issues in science
• has acquired journalistic and/or science writing skills through practice and increased knowledge of the scientific processes and science reporting

The course will be based on two week-long gatherings at Oslo Metropolitan University, including lectures, discussions and group-work

No course requirements

For the main assessment, the students may choose one of two term papers.

Either

• A reportage covering science or science related issues, followed by a reflection paper that discusses and analyzes the textual material theoretically helped by the syllabus, 15 - 20 pages.

Or

• An analytic, theory-based paper investigating a limited media output where science, scientific uncertainty or risks related to science are covered, 13-16 pages.

The term papers may be written in English or Norwegian (or another Scandinavian language).

Students who have failed a regular examination may submit a revised version of the exam one time. Students with legitimate absence are entitled to submit the term paper to the new examination.

The papers are evaluated according to a scale ranging from A to F, with A-E as pass grades and F as fail grade.