Programplaner og emneplaner - Student
MBH4220 Quality and Complexity in the Everyday Life in Early Childhood Education Course description
- Course name in Norwegian
- Kvalitet og kompleksitet i hverdagslivet i barnehager
- Study programme
-
M. Phil Programme in Early Childhood EducationM. Phil Programme in Early Childhood Education
- Weight
- 15.0 ECTS
- Year of study
- 2023/2024
- Curriculum
-
SPRING 2024
- Schedule
- Programme description
- Course history
-
Introduction
Alle hjelpemidler tillatt så lenge regler for kildehenvisning følges.
Required preliminary courses
A - F
Learning outcomes
Varied and student-active teaching methods are used in the programme. Good learning outcomes are first and foremost dependent on the students’ own efforts. The number of hours of adapted teaching at the university will be relatively low. Own effort means both benefiting from teaching and academic supervision and following this up with independent work in the form of theoretical studies and, if relevant, practical skills training. Normal study progress requires students to make great personal efforts. The most important work and teaching forms used in each course in the programme are described below. The individual course descriptions state which work methods each course employs. Practical training is described in a separate chapter; see below.
Web-based work and teaching methods
Several forms of digital learning resources are used in the programme, such as digital textbooks, digital lectures, video clips, podcasts, tests, learning pathways and assignments. These resources can be used to prepare for teaching sessions, during seminars using the flipped classroom method, and as part of self-study. This form of teaching requires the students to meet prepared for the scheduled teaching sessions. Interaction can also take place digitally, in the form of Skype meetings, webinars etc.
Self-study and student cooperation/group work
Learning requires a high degree of own activity and self-study, including both individual work and cooperation with fellow students. Through activities such as exchanging ideas, presentations, discussions, writing assignments and problem-based assignments, students will be stimulated to learn by communicating knowledge and experience, expressing their own opinions and, together, reflecting on their own attitudes, actions and understanding of the field. Students are encouraged to take initiative to schedule and actively participate in study groups to promote learning.
Lectures
Lectures are primarily used to introduce new subject matter, provide an overview and highlight main elements and links within different topics, and also to communicate relevant issues.
Seminars
Seminars emphasise dialogue and discussion between the subject teacher(s) and students in order to stimulate the student's academic development. Verbal presentations by students and discussions are emphasised.
In connection with the master's thesis, seminars are held where the master's theses are presented and discussed. The students receive feedback from their fellow students and teachers, which enables them to learn from each other. Research-related issues, methods and academic supervision are among the topics discussed in the seminars. Seminars can also take place on digital collaboration platforms.
Written assignments and academic supervision
Through written assignments and the master's thesis, students will formulate research questions for assignments and work on them over time, either individually or in cooperation with other students. They will learn theory and develop skills in using and referencing sources, analysis, discussion and written and oral communication. The primary purpose of this is to develop their ability to reflect critically, see elements in context and develop a deeper understanding of a subject.
Developing academic writing skills is a key aspect of all parts of the programme. Supervision is an important component of the work on the master's thesis. The supervision is intended to ensure that the project complies with research ethics principles and help students to formulate the research question and ensure quality in the collection and analysis of data.
Content
Arbeidet med de tre målområdene må ses i sammenheng med praksisopplæringen og undervisningen i fagdidaktikk (se egen emneplan for praksis). Alle aspekter ved målområdene behandles nødvendigvis ikke i undervisningen, men skal dekkes av studenten selv gjennom pensumlitteratur, aktiv deltakelse i undervisningen og øvrig studiearbeid.
Sentrale problemstillinger tematiseres fra ulike perspektiver i løpet av studiet. Arbeidsformene veksler mellom forelesninger, ulike former for gruppe- og prosjektarbeid samt selvstudium. Arbeidsmåtene omfatter øvelse i ulike vurderings- og veiledningsformer underveis.
Teaching and learning methods
Innholdet i dette emnet relateres i hovedsak til en videre fordypning av aktuelle temaer. Gjennom arbeidet med masteroppgaven får studenten anvendt sin kunnskap i forskningstradisjoner, forskningsmetodiske tilnærminger og forskningsdesign, samt vitenskapsteoretiske og etiske problemstillinger.
Course requirements
Coursework requirements are all types of work, tests and compulsory attendance that are requirements for being permitted to take the examination. Coursework requirements can be individual or in groups. Required coursework is assessed as approved/not approved. The coursework requirements for each course are described in the relevant course description.
The primary purpose of coursework requirements is to promote students' progress and academic development and to encourage them to acquire new knowledge. The programme's main coursework requirements are in the form of compulsory attendance, written assignments and tests.
Compulsory attendance
Attendance is compulsory in areas where the student cannot acquire knowledge and skills simply by studying literature.
If a student exceeds the maximum limit for absence stated in the course description or do not participate in a group presentation, the lecturer will consider whether it is possible to compensate for absence by meeting alternative requirements. This can e.g. be written assignments or oral presentations, individually or in groups. If it is not possible to compensate for the absence, the student must take the course the next time it is taught. Whether or not it is possible to compensate for absence depends on the extent of the student’s absence and which activities he/she has missed.
Written assignments
Several courses have compulsory written assignments or reports as part of their coursework requirements. Written work that is not approved must be improved before re-submission. If the work is not approved on re-submission, the student cannot take the ordinary examination/assessment.
The students are entitled to a third attempt before the resit/rescheduled examination. If an assignment is not approved the third time it is submitted, the student must re-take the course with the next class.
Assessment
Different forms of assessment are used on the programme that are adapted to the learning outcomes of the various courses. The forms of assessment used are intended to support learning and document the students’ level of competence in relation to the expected learning outcomes. All examinations taken that are part of the specialisation will appear on the diploma, as well as the title of the student’s master’s thesis. Students who take additional elective courses in excess of 120 credits get these on their transcript, and must choose which elective courses are to be included on the diploma. In general, the following forms of assessment are used in the programme:
Supervised individual examination
Taken at the university’s examination premises over a set number of hours.
Home examination
Taken over a set period of time at the end of the course, normally with a set question/assignment text unless otherwise stated in the course description.
Project examination
Taken over the whole or large parts of the course, normally with a topic decided by the students themselves unless otherwise stated in the course description.
Oral examination
Can take place individually or in groups. It can either be an independent form of assessment or used to adjust the grade awarded for another examination.
Practical examination
The assessment of specific practical skills either at the university or in the field of practice.
Assessment of practical training
Supervised practical training, assessed in accordance with the Regulations relating to Studies and Examinations at OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University.
The assessment of examinations and practical training is carried out in accordance with the applicable rules set out in the Act relating to Universities and University Colleges, the Regulations relating to Studies and Examinations at OsloMet and the Guidelines for Appointment and Use of examiners at OsloMet. The forms of assessment and criteria are described in each course description.
Examinations
All courses conclude with an examination. The assessment is based on the learning outcomes for the course, and the degree to which the student has achieved the stipulated learning outcomes is assessed. In theoretical courses, the grades used are pass/fail or letter grades from A to F, with A being the highest grade and E the poorest pass grade. The grade F means that the student has failed the examination. The grades pass/fail are used for the assessment of practical training.
Resit and rescheduled examinations are carried out in the same manner as the ordinary examination unless otherwise specified in the course description. In special cases, resit and rescheduled examinations in courses with group examinations may be held as individual examinations.
For examinations where a percentage of the examination papers are selected for assessment by an external examiner, the external examiner's assessment should benefit all the students. In such cases, one external and one internal Examiner will first grade the selected papers. The internal examiner then continues grading the remaining papers together with another internal examiner. The assessments from the first part are summarised to serve as guidelines for the assessments carried out by the two internal examiners.
The grade awarded for a written examination can be appealed, cf. Section 5-3 of the Act relating to Universities and University Colleges and the Regulations relating to Studies and Examinations at OsloMet. It is not possible to appeal the grades awarded for oral and practical examinations. In connection with group examinations, the result of an appeal will only have consequences for the candidate(s) who submitted the appeal. The other students will keep their original grade.
External programme supervisor
An external programme supervisor scheme is in place for the programme as required by the Guidelines for Appointment and Use of Examiners at OsloMet. The external supervisor will write an annual report on their work that will be included in the faculty’s area of the university’s quality assurance system.
Suitability assessment
The suitability assessment is a continuous overall assessment that takes place throughout the study programme. A student must be suitable for professional practice in order to receive diploma/certificate for the study programme.
If it appears that a student may pose a potential danger to the lives, physical and mental health, rights or safety of patients, clients and users during practical training or in future professional practice, it should be asked whether the student is suitable for the profession. University staff, personnel in practical training establishment, as well as students can submit a notification of doubt. The students concerned should be informed as soon as possible if such a notification of doubt has been sent. They should receive guidance and advice on how they can improve or be advised to withdraw from the programme.
https://student.oslomet.no/en/suitability-assessment
Suitability assessment is used in specialisation in Public Health Nursing, specialisation in Cancer Nursing and in Interdisciplinary Specialisation in Mental Health and Addiction.
Permitted exam materials and equipment
Eksamensinnhold: Læringsutbyttene.
Eksamensform: Individuell skriftlig hjemmeeksamen over én uke (7 dager), inntil 3000 ord
Grading scale
Alle
Examiners
Etter å ha gjennomført dette emnet, har studenten følgende læringsutbytte definert i form av kunnskap, ferdigheter og generell kompetanse:
Kunnskap
Studenten:
- har kunnskap om danningens og utdanningens betydning i et samfunn i endring, med særlig vekt på demokrati, bærekraftighet og mangfold
- har kunnskap om lov- og planverk, om den norske skolens prinsipielle ideal, om likeverd og elevers forskjellige oppvekstvillkår
- har kunnskap i hvordan de etiske dilemmaer som kan oppstå i skolens hverdag kan forstås å håndteres
- har kunnskap om unges læring, utvikling, motivasjon og forskjellige perspektivet på hva som kan fremme god læring, og hvordan dette kan brukes i planlegging og gjennomføring av undervisning
- har kunnskap om klasseledelse og lærerens betydning for å skape et godt skolemiljø
- har kunnskap om barn og unge i vanskelige livssituasjoner, samt kjennskap til relevante hjelpeinstanser
Ferdigheter
Studenten:
- kan analysere, drøfte og begrunne egne pedagogiske valg med utgangspunkt i læreplaner, relevante styringsdokumenter, yrkesetikk, pedagogisk teori og praksiserfaring
- kan analysere skolens, lærerens og kunnskapens betydning i samfunnet, historisk, nå og i fremtiden
- kan reflektere over og håndtere etiske dilemmaer som kan oppstå i lærerhverdagen
- kan reflektere over hva som kjennetegner god klasseledelse, og betydningen av å legge til rette for gode pedagogiske relasjoner og et inkluderende skolemiljø
Generell kompetanse
Studenten:
- kan kritisk reflektere over faglige, profesjonsetiske og utdanningspolitiske spørsmål
- kan utvikle sin læreridentitet i møte med elever og skole, videreutvikle egen kompetanse og samtidig bidra til både kollegers og skolens utvikling
- kan utvikle et godt skole-hjem samarbeid, og samarbeide med andre relevante aktører i skolen