ADSE2100 Menneske maskin interaksjon Emneplan

Studenten skal tilegne seg kunnskaper om design og evaluering av brukergrensesnitt. Studenten skal utvikle ideer fra skisser til konkret design ved hjelp av prototypingsteknikker, og bruke prototypene for å få tilbakemelding fra brukere. Studentene skal også kunne undersøke påstander om menneske-maskin-interaksjon ved hjelp av enkle kvantitative metoder.

Ingen ut over opptakskrav.

Etter å ha gjennomført dette emnet har studenten følgende læringsutbytte, definert som kunnskap, ferdigheter og generell kompetanse:

Kunnskap

Studenten

• vet hva brukersentrert utvikling innebærer
• har kunnskap om individuelle forskjeller mellom mennesker
• har kunnskap om egenskapene ved brukervennlighet
• kjenner til prinsipper for design
• kan forklare fagets spesifikke terminologi
• har kunnskap om forskning på brukergrensesnitt, deriblant påstander, empiri og hypotesetesting

Ferdigheter

Studenten kan

• utføre behovsanalyser
• kommunisere designideer ved hjelp av skisser
• utforme lavoppløsnings prototyper deriblant organisere informasjon visuelt og anvende kunnskap om kognisjon, for eksempel menneskets minnekapasitet og oppmerksomhet, til å forenkle brukergrensesnitt
• utføre brukertester
• måle brukergrensesnitt ved å designe enkle eksperimenter og anvende enkle statistiske verktøy

Generell kompetanse

Studenten

• kan utvikle brukervennlige brukergrensesnitt
• kan teknikker for evaluering av interaktive systemer
• kan dokumentere og forklare designvalg for oppdragsgivere og brukere
• kan tolke enkel forskningslitteratur som omhandler menneske-maskin-interaksjon

On successful completion of the course, the student has acquired the following learning outcomes classified as knowledge, skills and competence:

Knowledge

The student

• can define what EBP is and recognizes the rationale for EBP and shared decision making
• knows the steps of EBP
• is familiar with the levels in the S-pyramid and acknowledges the difference between single studies and systematic reviews
• knows the characteristics of a scientific article, e.g. IMRAD
• can explain the purpose and characteristics of qualitative and quantitative studies and syntheses of studies, e.g. systematic reviews
• understands the principles for critical appraisal and knows how to use check lists for different study designs, clinical guidelines and professional procedures
• knows different types of categorical and continuous measures of association and effect, and key graphical presentations

Skills

The student

• can identify different types of professional/clinical questions, such as questions about treatment, diagnosis, prognosis, experiences and etiology
• can, for each type of clinical question, identify the preferred order of study designs
• can formulate searchable professional/clinical questions using e.g. PICO
• and variations of PICO
• can construct and carry out an appropriate and simple search strategy for professional/clinical questions from the top of the S-pyramid

General competencies

The student

• can critically assess health claims in the media

The teaching is mainly designed with "flipped classroom" and learning activities in class and smaller groups. Digital learning resources such as digital lectures, videos and films will be available to the students in advance. Students are recommended to use these resources and to be prepared before the lectures and the seminars.

The following must have been approved in order for the student to take the exam:

• participate in at least 2 of 4 seminars

The students are recommended to participate at the seminar where they present the exam group projects.

Project examination, consisting of a group assignment with up to 5 students, based on a case with a health claim in the media. The assignment will include the levels of the EBP model. The assignment is submitted as a written paper of 1500 words (+/- 10 prosent) according to further specified criteria.

Each group decides whether their assignment is to be submitted in Norwegian, Swedish, Danish or English.

Resit exam: If the assignment is given the grade Fail, the group can submit a revised version once.

If this attempt fails, the group is entitled to a third and final attempt. In a third attempt, the group must choose a new health claim and submit a new examination paper.

All aids are permitted, as long as the rules for source referencing are complied with.

Pass/Fail. The same grade is given for all students in the Group.

One external and one internal examiner will assess at least 10 percent of the assignments. To internal examiners will assess the remaining assignments. The external examiner’s assessment shall benefit all the students.