Programplaner og emneplaner - Student
MALK4000-401 Complexity, Science and Society Course description
- Course name in Norwegian
- Kompleksitet, vitenskap og samfunn
- Study programme
-
Master's Program in Behavioral ScienceMaster’s Program in Behavioral Science - Specialisation in Innovation and ImplementationMaster’s Program in Behavioral Science - Specialisation in Concepts and Applications
- Weight
- 10.0 ECTS
- Year of study
- 2017/2018
- Curriculum
-
FALL 2017
- Schedule
- Programme description
- Course history
-
Required preliminary courses
Admission to the study program
Learning outcomes
On successful completion of the course, the student has the following learning outcomes
classified as knowledge and skills:
Knowledge
The student
¿ can describe and discuss societal influences that support a complexity perspective
¿ can describe and discuss complexity as a scientific approach
¿ can describe and discuss dualism as a philosophical perspective, and the effect of dualism in an applied setting
¿ can describe reductionism; emergence; critical mass; consilience; the unity of science, and other concepts from complexity science
¿ can give examples of analyses of the same phenomenon at different levels of reduction
¿ can describe and discuss differences in antagonistic and complementary professional approaches to the same phenomenon
¿ can describe and discuss the principle of selection at different levels of complexity
Skills
The student
¿ can analyze networks as the structure of complex adaptive systems
¿ can identify nodes and hubs, assessing the robustness and vulnerability of Networks
¿ can identify category mistakes and discuss mentalism and evolutionary approaches
¿ can cite sources and arrange a reference list according to the current standard from APA
¿ can use EndNote for citations and references in written assignments
Content
Complexity, networks, selection at different levels of complexity, unity of knowledge, dualism, natural scientific methods, levels of reduction and choice of analytical units.
Teaching and learning methods
The course will include lectures, discussions, individual reports and seminars.
Course requirements
Students submit 4 written assignments, each with maximum 3 pages including references,
according to the deadlines in the course schedule.
Assessment
Exam content: Learning outcomes
Form of examination: Individual written examination with invigilation, 4 hours
Examiners: One internal and one external examiner
Grading scale: A grading scale of A (highest) to F (lowest) where A to E is a pass grade and
F is a fail grade.
Examination support materials
None
Syllabus
Axelrod, R. M. & Cohen, M. D. (1999). Harnessing complexity: Organizational implications of a scientific frontier . New York: Free Press. [Also available as eBook: https://login.ezproxy.hioa.no/login?url=http://www.hioa.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron?target=patron&extendedid=P_903703_0]
Bar-Yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of complex systems . Boulder, CO: Westview Press.[*] [kap. 0] [Also available as eBook: http://necsi.org/publications/dcs/index.html
Bohr, N. (1954). The philosophical writings of Niels Bohr: Vol. 2. Essays 1932-1957 on atomic physics and human knowledge . Woodbridge, Conn.: Ox Bow Press. [*] [Unity of knowledge, s. 67-82]
Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences.Science, 323 (5916), 892-895. doi:10.1126/science.1165821[*] [Go to full text: http://science.sciencemag.org.ezproxy.hioa.no/content/323/5916/892.full.pdf]
Gjøtterud, K. (1989). Kan New Age trekke veksler på et paradigmeskifte i moderne fysikk? (Report Series nr. 89-23). Oslo: Fysisk institutt, Universitetet i Oslo. [*]
Mayr, E. (1997). This is biology: The science of the living world . Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. [*] [Utdrag]
Sandaker, I. (2006). How should behavior analysis interact effectively with the social sciences? Behavior and social issues, 15 (1), 81-91. doi:10.5210/bsi.v15i1.346[Go to full text: http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.hioa.no/docview/229305016?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
Sandaker, I. (2010). Et seleksjonsperspektiv på atferdsendring og læring i systemer. I S. Eikeseth, & F. Svartdal (Red.), Anvendt atferdsanalyse: Teori og praksis (2. utg., s. 470-485). Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.[*]
Schneider, S. M. (2012). The Science of consequences: How they affect genes, change the brain, and impact our world . Amherst, N.Y: Prometheus Books. [Also available as eBook: https://login.ezproxy.hioa.no/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=731614&site=ehost-live
Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures and the scientific revolution . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.[Also available as eBook: https://login.ezproxy.hioa.no/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=928032&site=ehost-live
Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge . New York: Knopf. [Also available as eBook: https://login.ezproxy.hioa.no/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=883082&site=ehost-live[Kap. 1-5]
(Literature list last updated: 2017-06-30 in the APA 6th style, lmb/Library Kjeller)