ACIT4030 Machine Learning for 3D Computer Vision Emneplan

The overall objective for the course Development Studies II is to give students an interdisciplinary understanding of development with a focus on Sub-Saharan Africa, the national and local experience in the context of wider regional and global influences.

At the end of the course the student has obtained the following learning outcomes:

Knowledge

The student:

• knows the application and experiences of various strategies of development

• has an understanding of and ability to apply concepts such as poverty, governance, inequality, power, human rights, culture, participation, empowerment, population and development research. An appreciation of the complex interaction between local, national, regional and global influences on development initiatives and outcomes
• has an overview of the political, economic, environmental and social aspects of development

Skills

The student:

• can carry out and present own research (an in-depth study within one of the above dimensions of development)
• can carry through a well-reflected problem-oriented analysis of development issues
• can critically collect data through own research and through other sources

General competence

The student:

• is able to provide problem-oriented explanations and use critical analysis in their work

We assume good background in programming, machine learning, and linear algebra. Knowledge of computer graphics and image processing is preferable, but not strictly required.

Students must have the following requirements approved before examination:

Before the home exam:

Introductory assignment - literature review (approved/not approved)

This is a paper of 1800 words (+/- 10 %) that is to be completed by the student during the first period of home study. Relevant literature is available online, through Leganto, and set books will be identified for students to purchase. For the assignment, students should write 2-3 pages on development in Africa based on the readings, and a further 2-3 pages on a theme covered in the reading list. Students will have the possibility to contact the seminar leader during this period.

The purpose of the assignment is to develop background knowledge in order to prepare for the time in Ghana, to begin the process of identifying a topic for field-study, and to show evidence of academic conventions (a supported argument with a range of sources that have been referenced). The paper is to be submitted before the start of the course in Ghana, and will be assessed as approved/not approved by the seminar leader during the first two weeks. A student who receives a 'not approved' is entitled to maximum two new attempts to fulfil the course requirement. A new deadline for the revised assignment will be made by the seminar leader in relation to each individual case.

Before the field study report exam:

Research diary (approved/not approved)

It is a requirement of the course that students keep a diary of their experiences in Ghana, which starts at arrival in Ghana, and with particular attention to the periods of fieldwork. The diary should include plans, methods and daily thoughts on the experience of doing research, by being reflective on the processes, successes and limitations. It could also include such things as interview questions, notes on focus groups, drafts of questionnaires, and links to ideas and debates in the literature. The guiding principle is that it is useful to the students as researchers as it will be an essential source when it comes to preparing the assignments. A requirement is that students write down some reflections each day during fieldwork, and the diary is assessed as approved/not approved by the seminar leader.

Oral presentation on field study findings (approved/not approved)

Oral presentation on field study findings (approved/not approved). This will take place during the last week in Ghana, when each group will present their field study. The focus is on the methodological experiences and empirical results of their fieldwork, but it should be related to ideas from the literature and issues and debates raised in the course. The purpose of the assignment is to consolidate the students' learning from both their own field study and the academic literature, assessing similarities and differences, and being aware of possible reasons for such comparisons. The format - an oral presentation - gives students experience in a useful skill, as well as providing a learning opportunity for other members of the course. The oral presentation will be of approx. 30 minutes, and is assessed as approved/not approved by the seminar leader.

Course work requirements must be met within fixed deadlines. Lectures and seminars are mandatory, due to field preparations and group activities. Students who, due to illness or other valid and documented reasons (such as a medical certificate), do not meet the work requirements within the fixed deadlines, may be given a new deadline, in each individual case given by the seminar leader. Students who, due to the same reasons, have less than 80% attendance at lectures and seminars, will by the seminar leader be given a written assignment of 2000 words (+/- 10 %) over a fixed topic and with a fixed deadline. Students who do not comply with this lose the right to take the final exam (i.e. submit their field study report).

Undervisningen vil veksle mellom forelesninger av faglærere og gjesteforelesere. Studentene deltar aktivt i undervisningen og i gruppearbeid. Masterstudiet er basert på individuelle studier med deltagelse i grupper, forelesninger og seminar. Det legges vekt på både teoretisk og praktisk arbeid som studieform.

Følgende arbeidskrav er obligatoriske og må være godkjent for å framstille seg for eksamen:

• minst 80 % tilstedeværelse på obligatorisk undervisning og seminarer

Alle;hjelpemidler er tillatt så lenge regler for kildehenvisning følges.

Bestått/ikke bestått.

Én intern og én ekstern sensor

For the final assessment a grading scale from A to E is used, where A denotes the highest and E the lowest pass grade, and F denotes a fail.

Two internal examiners. External examiner is used periodically.