Programming in Education, Level 5–10 Programme description

A coursework requirement is a compulsory piece of work/activity that must be approved before the student may take an examination. Coursework requirements are assessed "approved" or "not approved".

Not approved coursework requirements

Legitimate absence based on, for example, a medical certificate, does not exempt students from meeting the coursework requirements. Students who, due to illness or any other documented legitimate absence, do not meet the coursework requirements within the appointed deadline, should as far as possible be given a new attempt to meet the requirements before the relevant examination. An agreement with the relevant lecturer must be made in each individual case.

If, due to the nature of the subject/course, it is not possible to implement a new attempt to meet the requirements before the course exam, the student must expect to submit the coursework requirements at the next possible submission deadline. This may lead to a delay in progression through the Master's programme.

If a work requirement is assessed “not approved”, students have two chances to retake the work requirement. A work requirement that is assessed “not approved” three times, will result in loss of the right to take the course exam.

Mandatory attendance

In courses that require mandatory attendance, students must meet the minimum attendance requirement to pass the course. Failure to meet the minimum requirement will result in a loss of the right to take the course exam.

In cases where a student have a valid reason for absence due to illness or other legitimate reasons that can be documented, the teacher is responsible for making compensatory arrangement in order for the student to catch up on what he/she has missed. This could for example be a one-on-one tutorial or written assignment.

The administration processes all applications for exemptions.

Provisions governing examinations are laid down in the Act relating to Universities and University Colleges and the Regulations relating to Studies and Examinations at OsloMet.

Assessment methods vary between courses. They include written reports, portfolio assessments, written exams, oral presentations and oral exams.

A portfolio assessment provides an overall assessment awarding one grade for the whole portfolio. Students may only appeal against the determination of the examination grade awarded for the whole portfolio. Any information on weighting of grades must be considered as supplementary information in connection with the final grade. If the portfolio consists of elements such as an oral presentation, practical work etc., the examination result cannot be appealed against. The right to appeal is stated in the individual course descriptions.

If the examination in a course consists of more than one part, all parts of the examination must be passed in order to pass the course.

Normally each course has two internal examiners to assess students' work. Each semester one course will be chosen to include an external examiner, thus the students' work will be assessed by one external and one internal examiner. The Master's thesis is assessed by the two external examiners. Guidelines for master's theses at the Faculty can be found here: Retningslinjer for masteroppgaver ved Fakultet for teknologi, kunst og design - Student - minside (oslomet.no)

Quality assurance

The purpose of OsloMet's quality assurance system is to strengthen students' learning outcomes and development by raising the quality at all levels. Cooperation with the students, and their participation in the quality assurance work, is decisive to the overall learning outcome. Among the overall goals for the quality assurance system is to ensure:

• that the educational activities, including practical training and the learning and study environment, maintain a high level of quality
• that the study programmes are relevant for the professional fields
• that the quality development continues to improve

For the students, this entails, among other things, student evaluations in the form of:

• course evaluations
• annual student surveys for all of OsloMet

More information about the quality assurance system is available here: https://student.oslomet.no/regelverk#etablering-studium-evaluering-kvalitetssystem

Programme supervisor scheme

The programme supervisor scheme is part of the quality assurance of each individual study programme. A programme supervisor is not an examiner, but someone who supervises the quality of the study programmes. All study programmes at OsloMet shall be subject to supervision by a programme supervisor, but there are different ways of practising the scheme. Reference is made to the Guidelines for Appointment and Use of Examiners at OsloMet: https://student.oslomet.no/retningslinjer-sensorer

Læringsutbyttebeskrivelsene fremkommer i emneplanene.

Studiet er helt nettbasert, men krever at studentene følger en gitt plan og progresjon, for å skape et felles læringsmiljø med øvrige deltakere og involverte lærere. Studiet vil ta i bruk instruksjonsvideoer, nettbaserte forelesninger og diskusjoner og det vil bli gitt tilbud om veiledning i nettmøter.

Studiet forutsetter studentaktivitet knyttet til praktiske øvingsoppgaver, samarbeid, refleksjoner, medstudentvurderinger og erfaringsdeling på egen arbeidsplass. Det vil også bli lagt til rette for flervalgsoppgaver for egenevaluering.

I hvert emne inngår to arbeidskrav. Arbeidskravene skal være levert/utført innen fastsatt(e) frist(er). Arbeidskrav vurderes til ”Godkjent” eller ”Ikke godkjent”. Studenter som leverer/utfører arbeidskrav innen fristen, men som får vurderingen ”Ikke godkjent”, har anledning til to nye innleveringer/utførelser. Studenten må da selv avtale ny innlevering av det aktuelle arbeidskravet med faglærer. Studenter som ikke leverer/utfører arbeidskrav innen fristen og som ikke har dokumentert gyldig årsak, får ingen nye forsøk.

Gyldig fravær dokumentert med for eksempel sykemelding, gir ikke fritak for å innfri arbeidskrav. Studenter som på grunn av sykdom eller annen dokumentert gyldig årsak ikke leverer/utfører arbeidskrav innen fristen, kan få forlenget frist. Ny frist for å innfri arbeidskrav avtales i hvert enkelt tilfelle med den aktuelle læreren.

Nærmere informasjon om arbeidskrav finnes i den enkelte emneplan.

Hovedformålet med vurdering og veiledning er å forbedre den faglige og didaktiske utviklingen hos den enkelte student. Vurdering og veiledning skal skje fortløpende gjennom hele året. Skriftlige arbeider følges opp av faglærere med veiledning og muntlig og/eller skriftlig tilbakemelding. Etter hvert halvår skal studenter og faglærere oppsummere og evaluere undervisningen og andre læringsaktiviteter.

Eksamenskandidatens rettigheter og plikter framgår av forskrift for studier og eksamen ved OsloMet – storbyuniversitetet. Forskriften beskriver blant annet vilkår for ny/utsatt eksamen, klageadgang og hva som regnes som fusk ved eksamen. Studenten har plikt til å gjøre seg kjent med bestemmelsene i forskriften.

Retten til å avlegge eksamen forutsetter godkjente arbeidskrav.

For nærmere informasjon om avsluttende vurdering, se emneplanene.

Sensorordning

Se emneplanene.

Programming in Education, Level 5-10

Videreutdanning for lærere, deltid

Studieprogramkode: PROGO

Emnekoder:

Emne 1: PRG6100

Emne 2: PRG6200

Godkjent av utdanningsutvalget 25. januar 2019

Siste revisjon utført 2022, høst

Gjeldende fra høstsemesteret 2023

Fakultet for lærerutdanning og internasjonale studier

Institutt for grunnskole- og faglærerutdanning