One-year Programme in Media and Communication Programme description

A student who has completed this course should have the following learning outcomes defined in terms of knowledge, skills and general competence:

Knowledge

On successful completion of this course the student:

• has thorough knowledge of writing in research processes
• has advanced knowledge of forums and channels in which research results are published
• has thorough knowledge of the formal academic writing conventions
• has thorough understanding of the common research methods within either qualitative or quantitative research

Skills

On successful completion of this course the student:

• can find research results in literature databases
• can analyse and critically evaluate various information sources
• can write summaries using his/her own words
• can formulate scientific reports
• can use electronic reference tools
• can carry out objective and constructive peer reviews on written work
• can identify the research method used in a scientific text
• can explain the application of a research method in a research project
• can discuss and compare research approaches in the domain of quantitative or qualitative methods

General competence

On successful completion of this course the student:

• can identify research fraud and plagiarism
• has a thorough knowledge of responsibility for author and co-authorship in accordance with the Vancouver Convention

All modules will be taught as lectures / seminars with assignments for students. Throughout the course, students will work on an individual essay from their own specialization topic. The essay will contain:

• a literature survey
• a discussion on the methods applied by the researchers in the material reviewed in their survey
• a discussion on the ethical challenges related their topic both with regard to the research applied and relative to uses in society

The essay will give the opportunity for the student to tie together all modules in this course into a cohesive document.

The following required coursework must be approved before the student can take the exam:

Two mandatory assignments:

• One recorded presentation of between 10 and 15 minutes.
• A spreadsheet containing results of a research survey including columns for relevant meta-information with at least 7 relevant research papers

Written individual essay of between 7500 and 10000 words.

All aids are permitted.

For the final assessment a grading scale from A to E is used, where A denotes the highest and E the lowest pass grade, and F denotes a fail.

Two internal examiners. External examiner is used periodically. The exam grade can be appealed.

The course is divided into three modules, the first is in navigating the world of scientific literature. Here, the course will focus on the structure of scientific documents such as thesis and research papers as well as how to search for and find relevant literature for own research. It will also cover presentation technique in this part. Module one will be based on mainly lectures and workshops/labs where students work on assignments.

Topic keywords Module 1:

• Structure of research papers and thesis
• Conducting literature surveys
• Presentation technique and public speaking

The second module will focus on different research methods. There will be several versions of this module available focusing on sub-areas of research methods, such as quantitative methods. Here, the student will pick the appropriate module for their own specialization field. The modules will be taught with their own structure, either seminar or regular lab-based teaching where appropriate.

Topic keywords:

• Module 2A - Quantitative methods
• Module 2B - Qualitative methods

The third and final module will cover aspects of ethics in research, such as plagiarism and forgery.

Topic keywords Module 3:

• Plagiarism in research
• Forgery of scientific results
• The role of the researcher / expert

Det er avsluttende vurdering av hvert emne.

Vurderingsformer som benyttes i studiet, inkluderer teoretiske og/eller praktiske semesteroppgaver, skoleeksamen, mappevurdering, hjemmeeksamen, muntlig høring og rapport. Det vil i de fleste emner kreves deltagelse i den organiserte undervisningen for at studenten skal kunne besvare oppgaver ved avsluttende vurdering på en tilfredsstillende måte. Med mindre annet er oppgitt under overskriften Vurdering i emneplanene, kan eksamensbesvarelser leveres på norsk, dansk, svensk eller engelsk.

Alle skriftlige besvarelser skal følge retningslinjer gitt i fagtekstmal ved Institutt for journalistikk og mediefag.

Ved avsluttende vurdering av hvert emne benyttes vurderingsuttrykk bestått/ikke bestått eller en gradert skala med fem trinn fra A til E for bestått og F for ikke bestått. Hvilken vurderingsform og hvilket vurderingsuttrykk som benyttes, framgår av beskrivelsen av hvert emne.

I emner hvor den avsluttende vurderingen består av to deler, danner del 1 grunnlag for karakteren, mens karakteren kan justeres ett trinn opp eller ned i en muntlig høring i del 2.

Når en praktisk produksjon og/eller en oppgave gitt som arbeidskrav i et emne er tilknyttet en avsluttende vurdering, skal studenten som regel utarbeide et refleksjonsnotat. Et refleksjonsnotat er en metoderapport med drøfting i lys av pensum, der studentene skal beskrive og vurdere det de har jobbet med.

I tilfeller hvor det i den avsluttende vurderingen inngår en oppgave opprinnelig gitt som arbeidskrav, er arbeidskravet å anse som et forarbeide til mappevurdering. Studenten kan gjøre endringer i teksten før innlevering.

Ny/utsatt eksamen

Dersom ikke annet fremkommer av emneplanen, må både vurderingsdel 1 og 2 tas på nytt ved ny/utsatt eksamen.

Sensorordninger

Vurdering og sensur skal foregå i samsvar med bestemmelsene om vurdering i lov av 1. april 2005 nr. 15 om universiteter og høyskoler og forskrift om studier og eksamen ved Høgskolen i Oslo og Akershus.