SP2S6100 Psychosocial Functioning in a Socio-Ecological Framework Course description

After completing the course, the student is expected to have achieved the following learning outcomes defined in terms of knowledge, skills and general competence:

Knowledge

The student:

• has knowledge of dramaturgical text analysis in a historical and contemporary perspective
• has knowledge of forms of communication and dramaturgical tools in scenic expressions
• has knowledge of central theories, models and methods within dramaturgy in a production perspective
• is familiar with research methods and has knowledge of ethics in the field of dramaturgy

Skills

The student:

• can analyze, elucidate and evaluate different aspects in the field of theatre
• can master practical work with dramaturgy and scenic instruments
• can shape, prepare and apply a directing concept
• can analyze, design, and evaluate dramaturgical concepts
• can reflect on his/her own dramaturgical competence
• can evaluate themselves as dramaturge in staging and group processes
• has insight into different forms of dissemination and ethical issues

General competence

The student:

• can reflect on and communicate knowledge about distinctive nature and directions
• can recognize and master idioms and experiment with artistic expression
• can plan and carry out projects over time based on various dramatic texts in accordance with ethical requirements and guidelines
• can apply knowledge of forms of communication and dramaturgical tools in scenic expressions
• can apply his/her dramaturgical expertise and make reasoned artistic choices
• can contribute to nuanced views and experiences together with others in group processes and in scenic work
• can make choices of drama and theme and apply this in meeting with different target groups
• can apply central theories, models and methods within dramaturgy in a production perspective

This course is primarily aimed at PhD candidates admitted to the PhD Programme in Health Sciences but is also open to other applicants. Admission requirements are a completed major, master's degree (120 credits) or equivalent qualification.

The course can also be offered to students who have been admitted to the "Health Science Research Programme, 60 ECTS", by prior approval from the supervisor and based on given guidelines for the research programme.

Etter fullført emne har studenten følgende læringsutbytte definert som kunnskap, ferdigheter og generell kompetanse:

Kunnskap

Studenten

• har bred innsikt i ulike forståelsesmåter og perspektiver knyttet til psykososiale vansker i skolen
• har oppdatert kunnskap om aktuelt regelverk og etiske hensyn i spesialpedagogisk arbeid i et inkluderende læringsmiljø
• har inngående kunnskap om ulike kartleggingsstrategier relatert til psykososiale vansker og skolens læringsmiljø

Ferdigheter

Studenten

• kan kritisk anvende hensiktsmessige kartleggingsstrategier i skolen for å avdekke utfordringer på individ- og systemnivå i skolen
• kan planlegge, gjennomføre og vurdere spesialpedagogiske tiltak basert på relevante kartleggingsmetoder, for å forebygge og/eller avhjelpe psykososiale vansker
• kan kritisk reflektere omkring strategier for samarbeid med eksterne miljøer rundt elever som viser psykososiale utfordringer

Generell kompetanse

Studenten

• har innsikt og forståelse for ulike faktorer som hemmer og fremmer læring og psykisk helse i skolen
• kan formidle kunnskap omkring miljøets betydning for utvikling og opprettholdelse av psykososiale vansker
• kan planlegge og legge til rette for inkluderende praksiser i skolen, alene og som deltaker i en gruppe

There is a 100% overlap with the course ZDT3 Drama and Theatre Communication - dramaturgy.

On completion of the course, the PhD candidate has achieved the following learning outcomes, defined in terms of knowledge, skills, and general competence:

Knowledge

The PhD candidate:

• is at the forefront of knowledge of methodologies related to the development of concepts and theories
• has an in-depth understanding of the relationship between human experience, concepts, and theories in a health science context

Skills

The PhD candidate can:

• develop a conceptual and/or theoretical framework related to their own research
• identify relevant clinical phenomena to develop concepts and theories
• analyse and interpret research findings related to concept and theory development
• address complex scientific issues and challenge established knowledge and practice in concept and theory development

General competence

The PhD candidate can:

• argue in favour of particular methodologies in concept and theory development based on scientific theory
• participate in discussions on concept and theory development

Arbeidskrav

For å kunne gå opp til eksamen i emnet må studentene gjennomføre og få godkjent følgende arbeidskrav:

Arbeidskrav 1: Individuell skriftlig oppgave i form av et refleksjonsnotat knyttet til likeverdig opplæring. Refleksjonsnotatet skal ha et omfang på 1500 ord +/- 10 %.

Arbeidskrav 2: Individudell oppgave knyttet til psykososiale vansker. Arbeidskravet dokumenteres i form av en podkast eller video på 3 - 5 minutter eller et skriftlig dokument på 1500 ord +/- 10%.

For utfyllende informasjon om arbeidskrav, se programplanen.

Faglig aktivitet med krav om deltakelse

Se informasjon om krav om deltakelse i programplanen.

Candidates must write an essay based on a concept and/or theory of their choice and apply principles from the methods of concept and theory development presented in the course. The essay must consist of up to 5,000 words and must be submitted no more than 2 weeks after the end of the course.

The exam in the course is twofold:

1. Development assignment - individual

The assignment must be on an issue linked to dramaturgy and relevant theory. 4500-5500 Words.

Assessed by two examiners. The course may be selected for grading by external examiners.

The assessment counts for 40% of the final pass grade.

The result of the exam can be appealed.

2. Practical exam - group

A group performance of approximately 20-30 minutes duration. Three weeks of preparation time is given. The group's written dramaturgical analysis and directing concept are submitted in advance.

The assessment of the practical performance exam counts for 60% of the final pass grade. The result of the exam cannot be appealed.

Assessment

A grade scale with grades from A to E for pass (with A being the highest grade and E being the lowest pass grade) and F for fail is used for the final assessment.

In some cases, the practical/oral group exams can be held as individual exams.

Both parts of the exam must be awarded the grade E or better in order for the student to pass the course.

Absence - fail

Students who due to valid absence do not take one or several exam parts that make up the ordinary exam, or who are given an F in one or more of the exam parts that make up the exam, can register for a resit/rescheduled exam.

If the student is taking the rescheduled exam in part 1 (the development project), it is done in the same way as for the ordinary exam. If the student is taking the resit exam, the development project that was graded F in the ordinary exam must be significantly reworked/improved - e.g. based on the grounds given for the grade.

If the student is taking the resit/rescheduled exam in part 2, it must be taken pursuant to agreement with the student administration. Three weeks’ preparation time is given. The students are responsible for contacting the student administration themselves.

​

Grade scale A-F

1. Development assignment - individual​

Two examiners. External examiner is used frequently.

2. Practical exam - Group

Two examiners. External examiner is used frequently.

Ved ledig kapasitet kan emnet tilbys som enkeltemneopptak. Tilbud gis kun ved ledig plasser.

Opptakskrav: Fullført årsstudium i drama og teaterkommunikasjon (60 studiepoeng) eller tilsvarende dramafaglig utdanning på universitets- eller høgskolenivå.