SIW4220 Qualitative Methods and Research Design Course description

A student who has completed his or her qualification has the following learning outcomes defined in terms of knowledge, skills and general competence:

Knowledge

The student

• has thorough knowledge of concepts in the history and theory of social welfare, such as poverty, social risks, social assistance, social insurance, eligibility, coverage, incentives, targeting, dependency, stigma, reciprocity, altruism, discretion, conditionalilty
• has advanced knowledge of explanatory models, such as the logic of industrialism, institutional and state-centered approaches, and power resource theory
• can analyse central concepts within comparative welfare studies, such as welfare regimes, decommodification, defamilisation, activation, universalism and selectivity, financial sustainability, political legitimacy

Skills

The student

• can apply theoretical concepts and explanatory models in the analysis of social policies, in a national as well as international context

General competence

The student

• is able to critically evaluate the use of concepts and models by scholars writing about social policies

Students must submit a coursework requirement of 18 pages (+/-10%) on a topic relevant to the course, to be approved by the course lecturer. The topic of the work requirement will reflect main areas of the course curriculum and lectures. The coursework requirement should be written in groups of 3-6 students. Students whose papers are not approved after the first submission will be given the chance to resubmit once and they may be required to resubmit papers of about 10 pages individually. Students whose papers are not approved after two submissions will disqualify from sitting the final examination.

The student's learning outcome will be assessed on the basis of an individual six-hour written school examination.

Students may use a spelling dictionary, as well as a bilingual dictionary during the written school exam.

A grade scale A-F.

The exam is graded by an internal and an external examiner.

A random selection consisting of at least 25% of the exam papers will be graded by both an internal and external examiner. This will inform the grading of the remaining exam papers.

Axel West Pedersen

Students are awarded grades on a descending scale from A to E for pass and F for fail.

Exams are assessed by an internal and an external examiner. External examiners assess a random sample consisting of at least 25 per cent of the exams. The grades given for this sample provide a basis for the internal examiner's assessment. The external examiner will also assess papers where there is doubt about giving a grade of pass.

Randi Wærdahl