MAIKT-EA E-assessment Course description

Through work with the literature and the course work, the student should be able to choose and design methods for electronic assessment that is adapted to the group of students and content at hand. The tuition is in English if English speaking students attend the course.

No prerequisites required.

A student who has completed his or her qualification has the following learning outcomes defined in terms of knowledge, skills and general competence:

Knowledge

The student

• has advanced knowledge about theories on assessment and evaluation, including summative and formative methods for assessment
• has thorough knowledge on methods for self assessment, peer assessment and teacher-student-assessment
• has advanced knowledge of the role of technology in assessment

Skills

The student

• can use and design methods for e-assessment that are adapted to the group of students and content at hand
• can analyse and deal critically with various sources of information on e-assessment
• can analyse existing theories and methods to identify problems and challenges within e-assessment

General competence

The student

• can analyse relevant assessment problems academically
• can apply the achieved knowledge and skills in the use of e-assessment
• can communicate experiences, academic findings, and challenges within the field of e-assessment

The course is totally net based. Literature will be presented and discussed in a chosen discussion forum. Students are supposed to take active part in these discussions. Theories from the literature are to be applied in students¿ evaluation of technologies and methods of assessment.

See general rules in the programme plan. Students must have the following course requirements approved before examination:

1. Present at least one paper from the list of literature for the peer students through a chosen medium (i.e. text, audio, video). Length: appr. 750 words +/- 10 % / 10 minutes
2. Comment on at least two of the other literature presentations. Length: appr. 150 words +/- 10 % / 5 minutes
3. Participate in making an overview of technology for assessment and its supposed application Length of individual presentations: appr. 750 words +/- 10 % / 10 minutes
4. Plan and discuss one assessment session for a given case, related to the course literature. Length of presentation: appr. 750 words +/- 10 % / 10 minutes

These tasks should be documented in a portfolio for each student.

The course is largely based on learning in collaboration with others. Such a learning process requires time spent together and cooperation. Therefore, it is expected that students are present and actively participate in classes and group work. The course is highly process-oriented and relies on independent activity from the students, regarding both practical and theoretical work.

Various work methods are used. The work will primarily take place in practical workshops, where discussions and testing of ideas will be accompanied by seminars and lectures. Students will have significant responsibility for their learning, organization, and completion of group work. Lectures, student-driven teaching, and guidance will be provided as needed.

The following coursework is compulsory and must be approved before the student can sit the exam:

• Plan, present and evaluate individual and group performances, both as an actor and as director.

Compulsory attendance at teaching activities:

The students cannot be absent for more than 20% of teaching and supervision activities.

The exam is divided in two parts:

Exam part 1. Performance followed by an oral discussion

Evaluation is based on aesthetical, ethical, and pedagogical criteria. The theatrical form of expression, adjusting to the participants, the content of the piece, and various framework conditions must be upheld by the student. The student´s reflections and analysis of the performance, as well as the process leading up to the final performance, are also assessed.

Normally the examination takes place individually, but it can also be taken in small groups.

A performance followed by an oral hearing counts for 60 percent of the final passing grade.

The exam result cannot be appealed.

2. Exam part 2. Written assignment.

A written assignment that includes a professional research question related to the performance in part-examination 1, and relevant theory. Aesthetic, ethical, and pedagogical considerations related to framework conditions and choice of expression/form are included in the exam.

The scope of the assignment is between 3500-4000 words (not including table of content and bibliography).

The assignment counts for 40 percent of the final passing grade. The exam result can be appealed.

In some cases, the practical/oral group exams can be held as individual exams.

Both parts of the exam must be awarded the grade E or better in order for the student to pass the course.

All aids are permitted, as long as the rules for source referencing are complied with.