MBH4250 Cultural and religious diversity in kindergarten Course description

Knowledge

The student

· has knowledge of the importance of theory of science in scientific work

· has broad knowledge of research ethics, fundamental social science research methods and their possibilities and limitations

· has knowledge of different epistemological positions, new ideas and innovation processes of relevance to the selected topic and research question for the bachelor’s thesis

· has in-depth multidisciplinary knowledge of a topic of their own choosing of relevance to child welfare officers’ area of expertise

Skills

The student

· can reflect on power structures, professionalism and their own role as a professional in the child welfare system

· can develop research questions of relevance to the field of practice and apply new professional knowledge in a methodical and scientific manner

· can find, assess and refer to research and practice-based knowledge in the field of child welfare in a relevant manner that sheds light on the research question

· can conduct advanced literature searches in various databases and apply knowledge of child welfare and social pedagogy in major written works

· can reflect critically on theory of science perspectives and different sources of knowledge in their own work

· can exercise source criticism when assessing and selecting literature and obtaining information online and in databases

General competence

The student

· can analyse and critically reflect on research ethics issues in the performance of child care and welfare work

· has knowledge of the formal and methodological requirements that apply to academic writing

· has broad knowledge of research and development work of relevance to a child welfare officer’s areas of work

· can document and communicate professional assessments in writing

· can update their knowledge of the field of child care and welfare

Teaching of relevance to work on the bachelor’s thesis. All students will be offered three 45-minute supervision individuall sessions. No supervision will be given in the final week before submission.

The following required coursework/compulsory activities must have been approved in order for the student to take the exam: 

1. INTERACT - INTER1300 

The following required coursework must be approved: 

Students must submit an individual log. Scope: 500 words (+/- 10%). The log requires participation at the two-day seminar. An individual assignment may compensate for absence. 

Read more about INTERACT and INTER1300 here: https://www.oslomet.no/en/research/research-projects/interact

Compulsory activities and coursework requirements must be completed and approved by the given deadline in order for the student to take the exam.

• Emnet inneholder fire temagrupper.
• Introduksjon til mangfold

1. Kultur, religion, livssyn, kjønn, seksualitet og legning, etnisitet
2. Mangfold på individnivå, gruppenivå og samfunnsnivå
3. Digitalisering og mangfold

• Rettigheter og mangfold

1. Rettigheter og medborgerskap
2. Religionspolitikk
3. Demokrati og ytringsfrihet
4. Majoriteter og minoriteter

• Mangfoldige fellesskap

1. Mangfold som ressurs eller utfordring
2. Uenighetsfelleskap
3. Livssynsåpent samfunn
4. Profesjonsetikk og tillit
5. Digital danning og dømmekraft

• Metode og teori om mangfold

1. Empirisk undersøkelse
2. Kvalitativ metode
3. Interseksjonalitet
4. Diskursanalyse
5. Digital metodikk

Individual bachelor's thesis.

The assignment must total 18-20 pages. The cover page, table of contents and reference list come in addition to this. All the pages, apart from the cover page, must be numbered and state the candidate number. The cover page must also state necessary information about which exam the paper concerns, and carry the exam code.

Font and font size: Calibri 12-point. Line spacing 1.5. The approved citation style APA for assignments must be complied with.

A selection of self-chosen readings, which comprises of 500 pages must be attached in the assignment.

Students who fail the exam or who were absent from the ordinary exam for a valid reason can take a resit/rescheduled exam. Students can submit a reworked version of the thesis once, and can receive one hour of additional individual supervision in connection with improving the thesis. Students must contact the person responsible for the course to organise a supervision session. No supervision will be given in July.

Students who fail twice must submit a new bachelor’s thesis based on a new research question at the next exam. It is the students’ responsibility to contact the person responsible for the course to schedule three supervision sessions well before the start of the course.

All aids are permitted, as long as the rules for source referencing are complied with.

Grade scale A-F.

All exam papers are assessed by one internal and one external examiner. A student's supervisor may not be the examiner for this student.

Marie Hatlelid Føleide and Birgitte Nyblin-Austgulen

Eksamen vurderes av to interne sensorer. Tilsynssensorer er oppnevnt for å vurdere helheten i programmet og eksamen i det enkelte emnet.